The advent of digital health records has changed how healthcare is delivered in the United States. The success of these systems relies on easy access to electronic health information (EHI). The 21st Century Cures Act was enacted to create a regulatory framework that addresses information blocking. This article looks at how this framework affects health IT developers, medical practice administrators, owners, and IT managers.
Passed in December 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act aims to improve healthcare outcomes by supporting better access to EHI. Information blocking refers to practices that hinder access, exchange, or use of EHI, except in certain situations specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). This legislation provides a legal basis aimed at improving interoperability in the U.S. healthcare system.
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is responsible for enforcing these regulations to ensure compliance with the mandates defined in the Cures Act. The focus on transparency in health information access marks a shift toward patient-centered care and coordinated healthcare practices.
Information blocking can occur in various forms, including:
To balance the need for access with valid concerns, the ONC has outlined eight exceptions to information blocking. These include:
These exceptions are important because they allow for the protection of sensitive information while promoting the necessary interoperability in healthcare.
The Cures Act brought about disincentives for healthcare providers involved in information blocking, beginning enforcement on September 1, 2023. The penalties can be significant, going up to $1 million per violation for health IT developers, while healthcare providers risk being excluded from federal programs, such as the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program and the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS).
Recent statistics from the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) predict a high volume of complaints regarding information blocking. By September 2023, over 1,052 complaints had been reported, with around 85% from patients. Over 90% of these allegations were directly related to healthcare providers.
The OIG has outlined enforcement priorities for investigations. These include cases that lead to patient harm, impact providers’ functions, or cause significant financial loss to healthcare programs. This focus highlights the importance of patient safety and effective care delivery.
To ensure compliance, health IT developers and healthcare providers need to review their policies and procedures thoroughly. This should include:
Health IT vendors bear a significant risk of penalties, making it essential for them to prioritize compliance and interoperability. Institutions using these systems must also confirm they can share EHI without incurring regulatory penalties.
The compliance landscape poses a large responsibility for health IT developers. They must ensure their systems are functional and compliant with regulations. Non-compliance can lead to severe financial consequences. Hospitals worry that some providers, including themselves, are facing penalties unfairly compared to others in the healthcare field.
The California Hospital Association (CHA) has highlighted these concerns, noting that the median estimated penalty impact on hospitals could reach $394,353, potentially exceeding $10 million for large academic medical centers. The CHA calls for clearer definitions of information blocking, as the lack of guidance complicates compliance efforts.
The financial impact for health IT developers and healthcare providers goes beyond penalties. The interactions between these penalties and federal program participation create additional financial risks, which can complicate administrative and operational challenges for healthcare organizations. This situation emphasizes the urgent need for effective compliance measures across the healthcare system.
As complaints continue to grow, the OIG will need to determine which cases to prioritize, influencing how health IT vendors develop their products. By creating solutions that support compliance and interoperability, vendors can position themselves competitively in the healthcare market.
In terms of compliance with information blocking regulations, integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation can help health IT developers and providers improve efficiency. AI solutions can streamline the processes related to accessing, exchanging, and using electronic health information.
AI can identify patterns in data access and detect potential bottlenecks in health information exchanges. By recognizing where information blocking may occur—whether from technical, contractual, or administrative barriers—AI tools can notify organizations of compliance issues before they become significant problems.
Successful implementation of the regulations regarding information blocking requires cooperation among stakeholders in the healthcare system. Advocacy from organizations like the CHA and guidance from regulatory bodies such as ONC and HHS are crucial for developing clearer definitions and educational resources on compliance.
The upcoming enforcement of information blocking regulations will reshape healthcare information sharing. Stakeholders are encouraged to engage with regulatory authorities to develop supportive measures as they navigate these regulations.
In summary, the regulatory framework from the 21st Century Cures Act addresses important topics about information access in healthcare. As organizations work within this environment, using technological solutions like AI and fostering collaboration among stakeholders will be essential for a healthcare system that focuses on patient care and data interoperability.
Simbo is making doctors' and patients' lives better. Connect now to know more.
Schedule Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
