In the evolving situation of healthcare in the United States, financial assistance policies are important for ensuring access to necessary medical care for all patients. The concept of “Amounts Generally Billed” (AGB) is central to these policies. This is especially relevant for nonprofit hospitals that must follow IRS guidelines under Section 501(r). This article discusses how fair pricing is implemented, its impact on patients and providers, and the role of technology, particularly artificial intelligence, in improving these systems.
AGB is the average amount a hospital charges its insured patients for similar services. The IRS requires tax-exempt hospitals to limit charges for patients eligible for financial assistance to their AGB. Essentially, patients cannot be charged more than what is billed to insured individuals for emergency or medically necessary care.
As of April 2024, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) has set its AGB percentage at 26%, meaning eligible patients receive a 74% discount off their total billed charges. Other facilities under Vanderbilt have similar policies, with AGB figures as low as 16% at Vanderbilt Tullahoma-Harton Hospital. These discounts highlight the hospitals’ commitment to fair pricing and aim to lessen the financial burden on patients who may not afford full charges.
Each hospital must have a written Financial Assistance Policy (FAP) that ensures no patient is turned away due to inability to pay medical bills. According to IRS regulations, the FAP should detail eligibility criteria, application processes, and the types of assistance available, including sliding-scale discounts and payment plans.
For example, Scotland Memorial Hospital recognizes the financial challenges many patients face. It has a sliding fee policy for uninsured low-income individuals. This policy helps reduce the financial strain on patients who need preventive and necessary services. It allows them to pay based on their income levels while avoiding the higher charges often associated with insurance.
Despite regulations requiring FAPs, there is considerable variability in how hospitals apply these financial assistance policies. A study found that income cutoffs for assistance eligibility varied from 100% to 600% of the federal poverty level (FPL). This inconsistency can leave many uninsured or underinsured patients with little support when they need it most.
In 2013, one nonprofit health system filed over 700 lawsuits against patients for unpaid medical bills, while another in the same area filed only 40. Such differences illustrate inconsistencies in debt collection practices and point to the need for a standardized approach across healthcare facilities to promote fairness and transparency.
Hospitals have an ethical responsibility to provide emergency care without discrimination, regardless of a patient’s ability to pay. This is crucial, as individuals in emergencies should not face barriers to care.
Under IRS regulations, hospitals must ensure that emergency medical services do not deter patients from seeking care due to financial concerns. Emergency services should be broadly available, and hospitals need to promote their FAPs through community outreach and other means, including language translations for individuals with limited English proficiency.
As healthcare facilities deal with the complexities of financial assistance programs, adopting technology—especially artificial intelligence and workflow automation—becomes essential. AI tools can help streamline patient interactions and improve the efficiency of financial assistance processes.
AI chatbots can be used on hospital websites to guide patients through the financial assistance application process. These chatbots can answer common questions regarding eligibility criteria, required documentation, and application status. This makes it easier for patients feeling overwhelmed by medical bills to find help.
Using AI to manage financial assistance applications allows hospitals to process requests more efficiently. Machine learning algorithms can evaluate applications against criteria quickly, reducing the time patients wait for eligibility determinations. This efficiency can result in quicker outreach, helping patients access the care they need sooner.
Integrating predictive analytics into financial assistance programs can help healthcare systems identify potentially eligible patients ahead of time. By analyzing demographic data, past billing records, and healthcare usage patterns, hospitals can anticipate which patients may need support and reach out to them before financial difficulties arise. These targeted efforts can assist patients better and also lower bad debt costs for hospitals.
Transparency in hospital billing practices is crucial for effective financial assistance programs. Patients should have clear information about the costs of the services they need. Implementing price estimation tools can help patients forecast their out-of-pocket costs based on their insurance or available financial assistance.
Despite the beneficial frameworks established by the IRS for tax-exempt hospitals, significant challenges remain for patients using for-profit and government-run hospitals. Nearly 40% of hospitals in the U.S. are for-profit and are not subject to the same financial assistance guidelines. Thus, patients treated at these facilities may face higher charges without the protections that IRS regulations offer.
Additionally, hospitals that routinely charge uninsured patients higher “chargemaster” prices must be addressed. These prices often exceed the average rates reimbursed by insurers, putting significant pressure on those without coverage. This price difference can make uninsured individuals vulnerable, often leading to debt and financial hardship.
To enhance fair pricing frameworks, some advocates suggest moving away from linking financial assistance and fair pricing only to hospital tax statuses. This change would require all hospitals receiving Medicare funding to comply, regardless of their profit status. Such a shift aims to standardize protections and access across the healthcare field.
Improving fair pricing policies could also establish regulations that cap out-of-pocket expenses for low-income patients, limit aggressive collection practices, and encourage hospitals to adopt compassionate billing measures. States like California have taken steps in this direction by implementing laws to limit charges and collection efforts focusing on low-income and uninsured patients.
As the healthcare industry addresses inequities in financial assistance and billing practices, AGB is vital for fair pricing policies. Healthcare organizations’ commitment to transparently implementing these guidelines can help reduce the financial burden on many patients seeking essential care. The integration of technology will further support these efforts, facilitating access and efficiency within the healthcare system. It is important that discussions about financial assistance in healthcare continue, ensuring fair treatment for all patients without the added stress of financial concerns.