The healthcare sector in the United States has seen notable changes recently, particularly regarding the ownership of physician practices. The trend of hospitals acquiring physician-owned practices has raised questions about care management, operational efficiencies, costs, and quality of care. For medical practice administrators, owners, and IT managers, understanding the effects of hospital ownership on practice management is increasingly important.
Many physician practices have moved from independent ownership to affiliation with hospital systems. This change is largely driven by economic pressures, the need for capital, and a desire for better efficiencies in care delivery. Larger practices, especially those with 20 or more physicians, have observed improvements in care management processes (CMPs) after being acquired by hospitals. Research shows an 11.0-point increase in CMP scores among these large practices under hospital ownership, while independent practices experienced a 7.0-point decline. This suggests that hospital ownership may improve care management capabilities, influencing chronic disease management and overall quality of care.
Small to medium-sized practices, defined as having fewer than 20 physicians, also showed improvements. They scored 3.8 points higher on CMP measures when acquired by hospitals, compared to a 2.6-point rise for independently owned practices. These developments indicate that hospital systems might be more effective in implementing care management practices.
However, there were no significant differences in health information technology (IT) usage between hospital-owned practices and those that remained independent. This suggests that, although care processes may improve under hospital ownership, health IT system integration does not significantly vary. IT managers should consider how technology can be utilized effectively to improve quality and patient outcomes, regardless of ownership.
The effects of hospital ownership go beyond management efficiencies; they also impact the quality of care patients receive. A systematic review found that physician-owned hospitals often provide higher-quality care at similar or lower costs compared to traditional hospitals. For example, charges for eight common procedures at physician-owned hospitals were approximately one-third lower than those at conventional hospitals in the same areas.
This finding indicates that physician-owned hospitals can enhance patient care, particularly in concentrated market environments where hospital mergers can lead to higher costs and poorer health outcomes. Patients in these areas face challenges, especially in cardiovascular care, where competition is limited and there are fewer incentives for quality improvement.
Despite these insights, the Affordable Care Act’s 2010 provisions effectively limited the expansion of physician-owned hospitals, creating obstacles to a competitive environment that could benefit patient choice. Presently, around 80% of Medicare Advantage markets are categorized as “highly concentrated,” with evidence linking higher hospital concentration to increased prices and poorer care outcomes.
Medical practice administrators and owners must consider how their organizations can respond to these market consolidation trends. Initiatives like the Patient Access to Higher Quality Health Care Act aim to remove obstacles, encouraging competition and improving patient access to quality care.
Private equity (PE) firms have gained influence in the healthcare sector, with PE investments in healthcare growing in recent years. In 2022, more than 860 healthcare service deals were completed, showing substantial PE involvement amid limited regulations on such transactions. PE investments typically seek short-term profits, which can improve operational efficiencies but raise concerns about care quality, patient access, and healthcare costs.
Research indicates that hospitals acquired by private equity firms often experience increased service charges. For instance, after being acquired, hospitals reported higher charge-to-cost ratios, with some studies showing a $407 increase in charges per inpatient day. Furthermore, patient experience scores have varied after acquisitions, raising concerns about whether financial motivations of PE firms affect care quality.
PE firms use consolidation strategies to optimize operational efficiencies through a “platform and add-on” approach to expand their market position. While some efficiencies are clear, the wider consequences might hinder competition in healthcare markets and disrupt care delivery systems. Therefore, medical practice administrators should weigh the potential advantages of investment against the risks to patient care and access.
For practice administrators, the importance of strong care management processes is evident. These processes are essential for assuring that patients receive timely and appropriate care, regardless of who owns the practice. Given that hospital ownership is linked to improved CMPs, it is important to understand which factors lead to these positive outcomes.
Key factors that contribute to effective care management processes include:
These elements work together to create an environment that supports high-quality care delivery, regardless of ownership. Administrators should stay flexible in applying these principles to improve patient outcomes.
With advancements in technology, it is essential to consider how artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation can improve the management of physician practices. AI solutions are becoming more common, offering opportunities for better operational efficiencies.
AI can be applied to various healthcare operations that directly impact practice management, such as:
By utilizing these technologies, IT managers can help their practices remain competitive, improve operational outcomes, and ultimately enhance the quality of care for patients. Understanding how technology integrates with care management processes will be key to building resilient healthcare practices that can adjust to ownership changes.
As private equity firms and hospitals continue to consolidate healthcare practices, the regulatory environment is also changing. The lack of strict oversight for PE transactions, with over 90% escaping federal review, complicates monitoring practices and protecting patient interests.
Medical practice administrators need to keep informed about new policies regulating private equity activity and hospital ownership transitions. Legislative measures like the No Surprises Act and increased transparency requirements aim to give patients clearer insights into care costs, balance billing scenarios, and the quality of providers in their networks.
Understanding these regulations is crucial for compliance and fostering patient trust and perception of care quality. Administrators should pursue ongoing education about regulatory changes and adjust their operations accordingly.
The transition of physician practice ownership from independent status to affiliations with hospitals and private equity firms has produced a complex healthcare environment. Medical practice administrators, owners, and IT managers must navigate this landscape carefully, using data and technologies to enhance care management processes. Focusing on a patient-centered approach will help practices improve quality, increase accessibility, and maintain financial viability, fulfilling their roles in healthcare delivery.
As the healthcare sector continues to evolve, understanding the effects of ownership structures, implementing efficient care management practices, and adapting to technological advancements will be vital for lasting improvements in patient care across the United States.
Simbo is making doctors' and patients' lives better. Connect now to know more.
Schedule Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
