Collaborative Approaches to Denial Management: How Multidisciplinary Teams Enhance Claims Resolution

In healthcare, denial management is an important concern for administrators, practice owners, and IT managers in the United States. The denial rate for U.S. claims has increased to an average of 12%, affecting revenues and creating operational challenges. Many healthcare organizations consider denials their biggest problem, with 22% reporting losses greater than half a million dollars each year. Additionally, 85% of denials are viewed as avoidable, presenting a notable opportunity for improvement in claims management.

The Need for Collaborative Denial Management

Denial management requires coordination among various departments within an organization. Traditional isolated structures often raise denial rates and delay reimbursements. A teamwork approach that brings together clinical, billing, coding, and administrative teams can help address the root causes of denials more effectively. For example, a multidisciplinary team can enhance the evaluation process for claims. Typical members may include patient financial services representatives, nurses, coders, billers, and physician advisors.

Successful collaboration helps all stakeholders understand their roles in the revenue cycle, leading to comprehensive solutions to denial issues. By integrating efforts across functions, healthcare providers can grasp denial causes such as coding errors, incomplete data, and lack of prior authorization, which are common reasons for claims being denied.

Addressing Siloed Operations

Isolated teams can create barriers to effective communication, worsening denial issues. As Michael McMann noted, “Siloed teams are a significant barrier to effective denial management, leading to increased denial rates and delayed reimbursements.” Reports for 2023 indicated an average denial rate of 17% for in-network claims, with considerable financial impacts for providers.

Multidisciplinary teams can reduce these silos by establishing shared goals and key performance indicators (KPIs). Teams can focus on objectives like improving clean claim rates and decreasing denial rates. Monthly meetings that discuss denial trends offer a platform for constructive dialogue, allowing teams to work together on solutions without placing blame. This strategy addresses challenges directly, cutting down the time needed to resolve denials and boosting overall efficiency.

The Role of Training and Education

Ongoing training and education for staff are essential for effective denial management. Teaching all relevant team members about their roles in the revenue cycle and denial processes is important. McMann stressed the need for multidisciplinary training, stating, “Training and education in multidisciplinary settings can enhance understanding of each team member’s role in the revenue cycle.”

Such training aids staff in recognizing how their actions impact claim approvals. Regular workshops and sessions that reinforce best practices can reduce common denial causes, improving overall revenue cycle management.

Technology and Automation in Denial Management

Enhanced Workflow with AI and Automation

Using technology in denial management can streamline workflows and lessen staff burdens. While many healthcare organizations utilize automation in revenue cycle operations, only about one-third are applying it to denial management. Organizations that adopt advanced technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), robotic process automation (RPA), and machine learning (ML) are better equipped to handle denial management complexities.

AI helps in identifying claims that may be denied before submission. By predicting potential failure points in a claim’s journey, organizations can create workflows that address common billing and coding problems. Predictive analytics improve approval rates and enable teams to concentrate on more strategic tasks.

RPA can automate repetitive tasks such as checking claim statuses and requesting documentation, allowing staff to focus on strategic objectives. Streamlining these processes helps healthcare organizations address resource limitations and boosts revenue cycle efficiency.

Collaborative Approaches with Payers

Effective denial management requires strong relationships with payers in addition to internal collaboration. Joint operating committee meetings and regular communication with insurance providers can provide useful information about denial trends and create a collaborative approach to problem-solving. Establishing clear lines of communication can lead to quicker resolutions and enhance trust for long-term partnerships.

Valerie DeCaro, a revenue cycle management vice president at DOCS Dermatology, mentioned, “The healthcare industry faces an acceleration in costs, and many organizations still rely heavily on outdated systems. Strengthening payer-provider relationships aids in addressing denial challenges quickly.” By improving relationships with payers, organizations can navigate denial management more effectively.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Denial Management Strategies

Continuously assessing denial management strategies is crucial for success. Organizations should perform data-driven evaluations to identify patterns and trends that can guide future decisions. By reviewing claims data and tracking denial rates, healthcare leaders can find specific areas that need improvement.

A recent report indicated that unresolved claim denials could reduce net patient revenue by up to 5%. Therefore, examining the root causes of denials and categorizing them—such as coding issues, authorization delays, or lack of medical necessity—can illuminate paths for improvement. Effective denial management aims not only to correct past errors but also to implement preventive measures against future occurrences.

Personalizing the Patient Experience

Including patients in the denial management process adds a personal touch that can enhance claims resolution outcomes. Healthcare organizations that adopt a patient-first mentality can see benefits in communication, speeding up appeals and improving patient experiences.

Amy Raymond from AKASA highlighted the importance of making patients central to denial appeals management. She stated, “We need a patient-first mentality, and involving patients in the communication process can expedite appeals. This approach builds trust and improves the financial experience.” When patients participate in the appeals process, they may be more willing to provide information or documentation that could expedite resolution.

Wrapping Up

By using collaborative approaches to denial management, healthcare organizations can effectively address the challenges of rising denial rates. Integrating multidisciplinary teams, leveraging technology, and engaging payers can provide comprehensive solutions that improve revenue cycle management. The combined efforts of stakeholders focused on continuous evaluation and improvement can turn denial management into a strategic advantage, ensuring organizations maintain solid financial stability.

As the healthcare environment changes, organizations must adapt their strategies to handle the complexities of claims resolution efficiently. By prioritizing collaboration, training, and technology, healthcare providers can position themselves well in revenue cycle management.