Credentialing is a key function in the healthcare sector. It ensures that healthcare professionals have the qualifications needed to provide safe patient care. Yet, challenges in the credentialing process have led to more denials related to provider credentialing, affecting revenue in medical practices across the United States. According to a report from the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA), more than 54% of medical practices in 2021 saw an increase in credentialing-related denials.
Credentialing-related denials pose a significant challenge for healthcare organizations. More than half of medical practices have reported an increase in these denials. Many practices are experiencing an average wait of 100 days for new provider credentialing. Healthcare leaders surveyed by MGMA identified long processing delays, poor communication from payers, and ever-changing requirements as major contributors to this issue.
The financial consequences of these delays are noticeable. A 2019 survey by Merritt Hawkins estimated that a one-day delay in onboarding a provider could cost medical groups around $10,122. As claims take longer for approval, practices face cash flow challenges and labor-intensive processes to resolve claims denials, which puts additional strain on their operations.
The situation is made worse by a lack of standardization among payers, which creates confusion and administrative difficulties for medical staff. Many organizations struggle with shifting requirements from payers, complicating the task of keeping provider files updated. Moreover, closed payer networks create obstacles, making it more difficult for new providers to join, which leads to more claims being processed incorrectly.
The financial impact of credentialing delays is significant. Studies show that delays quickly accumulate, causing revenue loss as new providers miss out on patient appointments and other services.
Practices not only experience delayed payments but also face increased administrative costs as staff focus on managing denials. Resolving simple denials can take between 2 to 8 minutes, while more complex cases may take up to an hour. This cumulative effect reduces the time and resources available for patient care, increasing the risk of burnout among staff.
The consequences extend beyond immediate revenue loss and inefficiencies. Failing to manage credentialing effectively can threaten a practice’s long-term viability. Organizations facing excessive denials risk losing eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, resulting in considerable financial setbacks.
Credentialing is vital to revenue cycle management (RCM). It affects various stages, from scheduling patient appointments to resolving final claims. Timely and accurate credentialing ensures that payments for services are received promptly. Any break in this process—like improper coding or delays caused by uncredentialed providers—can disrupt the entire revenue cycle, leading to cash flow problems.
Key performance indicators can help assess credentialing efficiency. For example, Days in Accounts Receivable and Clean Claim Rates are useful metrics. An ideal clean claim rate is about 90%, and practices aim for at least 75% of claims to be resolved within 60 days. Claims denied for credentialing issues are often flagged as “unclean,” which prolongs reimbursement times.
Overall, credentialing affects RCM and shows how interconnected each step in the billing and claims process is. Problems with credentialing can cause widespread financial challenges for healthcare organizations.
Aside from financial impacts, credentialing is essential for regulatory compliance. Adhering to laws and regulations from agencies like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and The Joint Commission is crucial for healthcare organizations. Non-compliance could lead to penalties, loss of licenses, and increased legal risks.
Not complying with credentialing standards can make organizations ineligible for reimbursements, further affecting revenue. The consequences of failing to properly vet healthcare professionals can be severe, including lawsuits stemming from malpractice. The case of a Texas hospital that did not conduct adequate background checks highlights the risks associated with credentialing. It serves as a reminder that effective credentialing is important for both financial stability and patient safety.
Medical practices encounter various difficulties in their credentialing processes. Lengthy applications, document verification, and maintaining accurate records are some obstacles providers deal with. A critical issue is poor communication with payers. Many practices report long wait times and inadequate responses when they follow up on applications or fix errors, leading to frustration and inefficiency.
Frequent changes in payer requirements also complicate credentialing challenges. Healthcare leaders have raised concerns about the rapid fluctuations in these requirements, making the process more cumbersome and causing administrative bottlenecks.
Payers may be hesitant to onboard new providers due to closed networks, which adds to the number of claims denied. Instances where providers are inaccurately classified or dropped from payer networks lead to out-of-network claims processing, resulting in significant delays and financial losses for practices.
Integrating technology into credentialing processes can streamline operations. Automating data collection and verification allows healthcare organizations to lessen administrative burdens. Reports indicate that specialized credentialing solutions can reduce management time by up to 93%, enabling organizations to concentrate more on patient care.
For instance, advanced software can standardize data and provide real-time updates on credentialing statuses, easing the workload for staff. Technology can help ensure compliance with evolving standards and regulations from CMS and other authorities, reducing the risk of penalties tied to discrepancies in credentialing records.
Additionally, workflow automation can enhance the management of credentialing cycles. This includes setting automatic reminders for re-credentialing deadlines, minimizing the chances of errors and oversights.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a significant factor in simplifying credentialing for healthcare organizations. It improves workflow automation by enhancing efficiencies in data management, communication, and decision-making.
AI systems can quickly analyze large amounts of data, identifying inconsistencies and flagging potential issues for human review. This reduces the manual work usually associated with credentialing verification, allowing staff to spend more time interacting with patients.
For example, AI software can monitor credentialing progress and gather essential documentation automatically. It can also improve communications with payers, alerting practices to any changes in requirements or application statuses instantly.
Moreover, using AI can address compliance challenges in a constantly changing regulatory environment. AI tools can update practices on new legislative changes that impact credentials and insurance requirements, helping them stay ahead of deadlines and reduce risks.
AI’s potential also extends to managing workforce needs. Predictive analytics can help practices determine staffing requirements based on credentialing timelines and patient flow, allowing for better planning and resource distribution. This approach ensures that practices optimize their human resources, improving efficiency.
At the same time, AI systems can track performance metrics related to credentialing, such as processing times for applications and denial rates tied to credentialing issues. Organizations can use this data to spot areas for improvement and adjust their workflows as needed.
Furthermore, implementing AI in credentialing can enhance patient satisfaction. When healthcare providers are fully credentialed and part of payer networks, patients face fewer disruptions in their care, resulting in a smoother experience.
To address shortcomings in credentialing processes, medical practices should follow best practices that promote efficiency and compliance. Keeping accurate documentation and providing timely updates of provider information is essential. Organizations can implement ongoing education for staff to stay current on credentialing standards and legal obligations.
Monitoring performance metrics is also a vital step in effective credentialing. Practices should regularly assess their credentialing cycle times, identify existing bottlenecks, and address them in a timely manner. Leveraging technology and integrating AI solutions can offer real-time insights into processes and lead to better performance outcomes.
Additionally, outsourcing credentialing tasks to specialized services may provide advantages. Expertise in the area can help streamline the credentialing process, alleviate administrative burdens, and allow healthcare organizations to refocus on core activities—patient care.
The growing challenge of credentialing-related denials is a complex issue in the healthcare sector. As medical practices face increasing financial pressure, it is crucial to navigate credentialing with efficiency and foresight. By using technology, improving workflows, and recognizing financial implications, practices can lessen the impact of credentialing-related denials and strengthen their revenue.
Solutions such as front-office phone automation and answering services represent one way technology can help practices manage their administrative workloads. As the demand for patient care rises, optimizing every aspect of healthcare operations, including credentialing, is essential for ongoing success.
Simbo is making doctors' and patients' lives better. Connect now to know more.
Schedule Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
